Classroom Applications and National Standards
A post on the Music Education Blog Collective shines some light on a possible revision of the National Standards for Music Education. The emphasis is on questions of how exactly do the national standards impact the music classroom and, specifically, what students are learning.
For me, I would say that the current national standards in their own form provide me a very beneficial framework with which to instruct my students. Unlike the standards of other subject matters, I find the music standards to be concrete and understandable. It helps me to focus more on teaching and learning in my classroom rather than just what to do to get through the next performance.
All too often, I believe, rote learning is emphasized in our music classrooms for the purpose of getting through the next concert. I believe the national standards help to keep us away from that trend, but, generally, only for those educators who have the forsight to do so. I do not think it is the "vagueness" of the music standards that are the problem. Rather, I believe it is the enforcement and accountability placed on those standards. At WEDJ, I am held accountable to those standards because that is what I grade on. If I haven't hit all of the standards, then I have nothing to give a student a grade for. This holds me true to my craft as a music educator and not just a choir director. In most schools students simply recieve one grade for music with no emphasis on evaluating the particular skills we are trying to assess.
I do not think that changes to the national standards are neccesary. However, I do think that administrators in schools, especially those that tout arts integration, should use the national standards as a template for the assessment of musical skills. Putting the national standards on the report card legitimizes music as a subject and hols us more accountable to the development of the skills we are supposed to be teaching.
